its hightime atleast to share with u on this platform n i'm happy for the same..
i dont and i cant really understand the ways things are going on..
can some1 make me understand the rationality behind grading some1 higher and giving some1 the worse?
grades r not the only concern now.. it surpassed many..
to be simple... crossed the threshold level.... :-((
main concern is:
does the rules of prm handbook applicable only to few?? (those who are not having the good image with the faculty??)
we often speak of level playin field and blah blah blah.. sustainable/equitable/equality & all the b.s..
is it only to the extent of speaking?? then wht is the need for all these things??
in the name of changin lives of rural ppl.. development....
every1 has his or her problems.. agreed.. but keep the issues and rewards equitable..
why the hell is some1 gettin undue advantage n why do some ppl suffer???
when some1 is in the position of influencin others and who is looked upon by many and holding some kind of power... shouldnt he justify the position he is holding?? shouldnt he be ethical??
i think this is hightime.. we introspect ourselves and other issues as well....
ps: i'm posting this only to vent out my anger.. no personal bias/issues/nor need any help(ofcourse cant xpect any)
only reason is to convey tht atleast try to follow wht u say or atleast try to..
1 comment:
It is clear that there is no clear playing field. Those who espouse that cause do so for their own convenience. In IRMA and in LIFE.
We all have our self interests. As they say "even love is a selfish deed"
Post a Comment